Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30637 (CHH)

RAMNARAYAN v. RANGMATI BAI

WP227/502/2022 · 2025-06-18

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:25773 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 502 of 2022 1 - Ramnarayan S/o Sukhram Aged About 35 Years R/o Village- Andhla (Vankhetapara), Tahsil - Lakhanpur, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Sukhram S/o Manbodh, Aged About 56 Years R/o Village- Andhla (Vankhetapara), Tahsil - Lakhanpur, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioners versus 1 - Rangmati Bai W/o Bholanath Kenwat Aged About 60 Years Caste- Kenwat, R/o Sohga, Police Station- Darima, Tahsil-Ambikapur,, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur,, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Sarda Prasad, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Rahul Mishra, Advocate For Respondent No.1 For Respondent No. 2 : : Ms. Priyanka Mehta, Advocate Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 19/06/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 2. No objection from other side. 3. Recording the statement made by Mr. Sarda Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI