Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30634 (RAJ)

OMVEER YADAV SON OF SHRI NARENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMA/462/2025 · 2025-09-23

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39267] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 462/2025 IN S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.8752/2024 1. Omveer Yadav Son Of Shri Narendra Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bijorawas, P.s. Behror Sadar, Distt. Kotputli, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Ayush Yadav Son Of Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Shimla, P.s. Mehada, Distt. Neem Ka Thana (Raj). 3. Shankar Yadav Son Of Shri Manohar Lal Yadav, R/o Patan, Sikar Neem Ka Thana, Raj. Presently Residing At Krishana Hostel, Jhalana Dungari, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Deepak Khinchi S/o Shri Mukesh Kumar Khinchi, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Mohabbatpura, P.s. Renwal, Distt. Jaipur Presently Residing At Hall Khatik Hostel Jhalana, Distt. Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshit Parashar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 23/09/2025 1. The present civil misc. application has been filed by the applicants seeking correction in the order dated 24.01.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Misc. Petition No.8752/2024. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants preferred the Criminal Misc. Petition No.8752/2024 [2025:RJ-JP:39267] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-462/2025] under Section 528 B.N.S.S. with the prayer to quash and set aside the F.I.R. No.491/2023, registered with the Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur City (East), District Jaipur City (East) for offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 307, 379 & 336 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(r) & 3(2) (va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. The Court vide order dated 24.01.2025 allowed the misc. petition of the applicant/petitioners and quashed & set aside the impugned F.I.R., however, in the said order, inadvertently ‘F.I.R. No.493/2023’ has been typed in place of ‘F.I.R. No.491/2023’, 4. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants and for the reasons mentioned in the present civil misc. application, same is allowed and the ‘F.I.R. No.493/2023’ be now read as ‘F.I.R. No.491/2023’ in the order dated 24.01.2025. 5. This order shall be treated as part and partial of the order dated 24.01.2025. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /70