1 2025:CGHC:28425 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6007 of 2025 1 - Tibriyus Tigga S/o Shri Stanislas Tigga, Aged About 43 Years Working As Mason (On Collector Rate As Daily Wages Employee), At Office Of Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department (B/ R) Sub - Division Jashpur No. 1 District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District -Raipur (Chhattisgah) 2 - Engineer In Chief Department Of Public Works, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department (B/r) Ambikapur Zone, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department (B/r) Bilaspur Circle, District Bilaspur Circle, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Executive Engineer Public Works Department (B/r) Division Jashpur, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Sub Divisional Officer Public Works Department (B/r) Sub Division Jashpur No. 1, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) --- Respondent(s) ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.06.27 19:48:28 +0530 2 WPS No. 6610 of 2025 1 - Smt. Shanta Bai W/o Shri Ranjeet Ram Aged About 54 Years Working As Sweeper (On Collector Rate As Daily Wages Employee), At Office Of Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department (B/r) Sub-Division Jashpur No. 1, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Engineer In Chief Department Of Public Works, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department (B/r) Ambikapur Zone, District Surguja Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintendent Engineer Public Works Department (B/r) Bilaspur Circle, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Executive Engineer Public Works Department (B/r) Division Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 6 - Sub Divisional Officer Public Works Department (B/r) Sub-Division Jashpur No. 1, District --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 27/06/2025 3 1. Since the identical issues involved in the above mentioned writ petitions, they are being heard and decided by this common order. 2. By the present writ petitions, the petitioners, who are working on the post of mason as daily wage employees on Collector rate under the respondent authorities/ Public Works Department since 2010 respectively, are seeking a direction towards the respondent authorities for regularization of their services. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are working under the respondent authorities/ Public Works Department as daily wage employees on Collector rate since 2010 and they are entitled for regularization in their services as per the circular issued by the State Government. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that as per the pleadings of the petitioners, they never approached the respondent Department claiming regularization of their services. He further submits that if the petitioners will submit a representation claiming their grievances, the same shall be considered in accordance with law and the relevant circular which is applicable to the case of the petitioners. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 6. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the State and looking to the fact that the petitioners have been working in the respondent Department since 2010 respectively, the petitioners are directed to approach the respondent Department individually by filing their respective representations raising their grievance. In the event of 4 filing of such representations, the concerned respondent authorities are directed to consider and decide the representation to be submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law and the relevant circular which is applicable to the case of the petitioners, within a period of 90 days from the date of submission of the representations. 7. With the aforesaid direction, both these Writ Petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok