1 APHC010443492019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21377/2019 Between: Brugubanda Venkata Jayalakshmi @ Tadikonda Venkata Jayalakshmi, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of A P and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PEERAMSETTY VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX (AP) 2. S GOPAL RAO The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned orders passed by the 3rd respondent vide Letter No.P6/IV/A-784/SP682/2017-03/291720 dated 18-10- 2019 as illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction and to consequently direct the same and to pass such other or further orders…...” 2 2. The proceeding sheet dated 17.04.2025 shows that learned counsel for respondent No.5 has submitted that the matter is settled out of the Court and sought time for getting instructions. 3. None represented on behalf of the petitioner as well as the respondents. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.04.2025 ARR 3 31 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21377/2019 Dt.25.04.2025 ARR