[2025:RJ-JP:39567] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14767/2025 1. Dr. Vivek Yadav S/o Kedarnath Yadav, aged about 42 Years, R/o Village Kurhi Post Katena Harsha District Firjodabad Uttarpardesh. Was working in Government Collage Sarmathpura Dholpur. 2. Atul Kumar Shrivastav S/o Ashok Kumar Shrivastav, aged about 35 Years, R/o 14/59, Sadar Bazar Chhbada District Banra Rajasthan. Presently working in under Rajses Government Girls Collage Chhbada. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner, College Education, Shiksha Sankul, JLN Marg, Jaipur. 3. Principal, Government College, Government Collage Sarmathura Dholpur Rajasthan. 4. Principal Under Rajses Government Girls Collage, Chhbada Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mithun Bhai For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 25/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.08.2023 passed in the matter of Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.1. and later on, affirmed by a Division Bench of this Court in a bunch of special appeal writ led by State of Rajasthan vs. Ram Chaturvedi & Ors.2 with the following modifications:- 1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1474/2023 2 D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.903/2023 [2025:RJ-JP:39567] (2 of 2) [CW-14767/2025] (1) The respondents/original petitioners/applicants are entitled to continue on their respective posts till they are replaced by existing regular employees or regularly selected candidates through RPSC. (2) The respondents/original petitioners/applicants would be continued on their posts provided that sufficient number of students are available for the particular course(s) for which they were appointed. (3) The respondents/original petitioners/applicants would be entitled to honorarium at the rate of Rs.800/- per hour as is being paid to them presently or as may be modified by the State from time to time. Therefore, they prayed that the writ petition be decided and disposed of in a similar terms. 2. In view of the above consensus, the present petition is disposed of in terms of the directions issued in Ram Chaturvedi (Supra) as modified in State of Rajasthan vs. Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. (Supra). 3. The petitioner shall be entitled for the same benefits which have been granted in the aforesaid judgment delivered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ram Chaturvedi (Supra) as modified in State of Rajasthan vs. Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. (Supra). 4. Stay application as well as all other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-33