ANUJ ALIAS VINOD JATAV ALIAS VINOD v. STATE OF U.P.
BAIL/9147/2025 · 2025-03-18
Deepak Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30622 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30622 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39037 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9147 of 2025 Applicant :- Anuj Alias Vinod Jatav Alias Vinod Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Bimla Prasad, on behalf of informant, is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 336 of 2024, registered under Sections 420, 406, 34 I.P.C., Police Station Govind Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar, during pendency of the trial.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Applicant having no concern with the alleged incident as made in the FIR. Applicant is a salary based employee in the company. Alleged amount stated in FIR has been deposited in company's account. On perusal of FIR, it is apparent that informant and applicant having dispute in regard to payment of rent. Various FIRs have been registered against the applicant on similar set of facts. Criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 12 to the bail application. The applicant is languishing in jail since 19.10.2024. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and co- operate in trial.
5. Learned counsel for the informant has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant and has submitted that prima facie offence is made out against the applicant, hence, applicant is not entitled to be enlarged on bail.
6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case,
submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the law laid
down by the Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant, Anuj @ Vinod Jatav @ Vinod, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Nitin Verma Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad