LAKSH AGGARWAL v. HIMANSHU JAIN, IAS, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER LUDHIANA AND ANOTHER
COCP/5703/2025 · 2026-03-17
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3062 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3062 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-5703
IN THE HI
216
Laksh Aggar
Himanshu Ja
CORAM: H
Present: -
NIDHI GUP
1.
violation of Court in CW and others’ direction:-
2.
order dated complied by
5703-2025
-1-
E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
COCP Date o
Aggarwal
Versus
shu Jain and another
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
Mr. AP Setia, Advocate for the
Mr. Amtiaz Sandhu, AAG, Pun
I GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
The present contempt petitio on of order dated 30.09.2025 (Annex CWP-29338-2025, titled as ‘Laksh ’ whereby the writ petition was d
“xxx
xxx
4. Keeping in view the abov the merits of the case, the prese with a direction to respondent N District Ludhiana, Punjab/com and decide the application/rep (Annexure P-13) of the petit speaking order; after affording all concerned parties, within today.”
It is submitted by learned coun dated 30.09.2025 (Annexure P-1) rep ied by the respondents till date.
ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5703-2025 Date of Decision: 17.03.2026
.… Petitioner
.... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA the petitioner. , Punjab. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Laksh Aggarwal vs. State of Punjab was disposed of with the following
xxx above and without commenting on present writ petition is disposed of ent No. 2 – Deputy Commissioner, /competent Authority, to consider /representation dated 29.08.2025 petitioner by way of passing a ding due opportunity to hearing to hin a period of four weeks from d counsel for the petitioner that the reproduced above, has not been
ging Writ
ing on of er, er 25 a to m the een RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.17 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
COCP-5703
3.
the represen decided by such, nothing
4.
Court is tak learned coun
5.
6.
required to b of, according
7.
Speaking O action still su
8.
9.
17.03.2026 rishu
5703-2025
-2-
Per Contra, learned counsel for presentation dated 29.08.2025 filed b d by the respondents vide Speaking nothing survives in the present petition
Copy of Speaking Order dated is taken on record. A copy thereof d counsel for the petitioner.
Heard.
In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly.
The petitioner would be at libe
Order, in accordance with law, i still survives.
Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, s 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
sel for the respondents submits that filed by the petitioner stands duly aking Order dated 19.11.2025. As etition. r dated 19.11.2025 handed over in thereof, has also been supplied to above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed at liberty to challenge the aforesaid , if so advised or any cause of any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No
Yes/No that duly As r in d to are sed said e of RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.17 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.