Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3062 (PAT)

Bhim Singh @ Neeraj v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./83919/2025 · 2026-03-17

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83919 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2025 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Bhim Singh @ Neeraj Son of Late Ashok Singh Resident of Village - Horil Chhapra, P.S. - Shapur, Dist. - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raju Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 5 17-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 25(9) of the Arms Act. 3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that during verification of a viral video, one Amarjeet Chaudhary, who was seen firing in the air with pistol and was apprehended, disclosed that he received the firearms from this petitioner and co-accused Golu Singh. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Specific accusation of exhibiting firearms in against co-accused Amarjeet Chaudhary and petitioner has been made accused only on the basis of his confessional statement. Petitioner is neither present in the video in question nor any firearms were recovered Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83919 of 2025(5) dt.17-03-2026 2/2 from his possession. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to three criminal antecedents of Excise Act. Similarly situated co-accused, namely, Golu Singh has already been granted anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 83456 of 2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering backdrop of the case and nature of accusation, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Shahpur P. S. Case No. 209 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T