1 2025:CGHC:30636 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 667 of 2024 Kwality Foundry Industries Through Its Proprietor, Ravi Waswani, S/o Shri Gyan Chand Waswani, R/o M.I.G. 4, Indrawati Colony, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) ... Appellant. versus 1 - Ankit Ispat Private Limited Through Chief Managing Director, A.M.L. Towers No. 9, 6th Street, Gopalpuram, Chennai (Tamilnadu) 2 - Ashok Agrawal S/o R.R. Agrawal Aged About 63 Years Chief Managing Director, A.M.L. Steel, R/o Agrawal House House No. 213, Lands Road, Kilpark, Chennai-18 (Tamilnadu) 3 - Ajay Agrawal S/o Gourishankar Agrawal Aged About 50 Years Managing Director, A.M.L. Steel, R/o Agrawal House House No. 213, Lands Road, Kilpark, Chennai-18 (Tamilnadu) 4 - Ankit Agrawal S/o Ashok Agrawal Aged About 36 Years Director A.M.L. Steel, R/o Agrawal House House No. 213, Lands Road, Kilpark, Chennai-18 (Tamilnadu) ... Respondents. For Appellant. : Mr. Sourabh Agrawal, Adv on behalf of Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent : None. SB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 04.07.2025 1. The appellant has filed this acquittal appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 10.05.2023 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur Criminal Case No.749/2016, whereby, the respondent/accused has been acquitted of the charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=CHATTISGARH, c=IN 2 1881 (for short, “the NI Act”). 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that recently in the judgment dated 08.04.2025 rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., 2025 INSC 804, right to file appeal under proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. was discussed and it was held that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the Court acquitting the accused and such appeal shall lie to the Court to which an appeal ordinarily lies against the order of conviction of such Court. He submits that the case may be disposed of reserving liberty so as to avail the said remedy. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission and considering the law declared in the matter of Celestium Financial (supra), this appeal stands disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the appellant to file an appeal within a period of 45 days from this order before the appropriate Court, in accordance with law. It is further made clear that if such an appeal is filed before the concerned Court within the time given by this Court, it would not insist upon the limitation while deciding the same and will proceed to decide the same in accordance with law. 4. Registry shall return the certified copy of the order/judgment and relevant documents to counsel for the appellant after retaining its photocopy. 5. Registry shall send back the record to the concerned Court. 6. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Ajay/Avinash.