Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30617 (BOM)

PRASHANT JAGATRAO PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH CHIEF LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

WP/13746/2024 · 2025-01-20

Shri S G Mehare, Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 21 WRIT PETITION NO. 13746 OF 2024 PRASHANT JAGATRAO PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH CHIEF LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Ghute Patil Kishor J. AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. P. S. Patil. … CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ. DATE : 20.01.2025 PER COURT :- 1. The dispute is about gratuity and leave encashment. The petitioner contends that the part payment has been made and remaining has not been paid. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the gratuity dispute may be entertained by the Labour Commissioner and the remedy is available under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. When we expressed disinclination to entertain the writ petition, he sought leave to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate Authority. 2. Leave granted as prayed for. 2025:BHC-AUG:1752-DB 3. Writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) (S. G. MEHARE, J.) … vmk/-