Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30616 (KAR)

SRI. JAYANNA v. CANARA BANK

WP/48059/2017 · 2025-02-18

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7145 WP No. 48059 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 48059 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. JAYANNA S/O PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.589/1, KENGERI, BAZAAR STREET, NEAR OUTER RING ROAD, KENGERI TOWN, BANGALORE-560 060. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N.SURESHA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. CANARA BANK J.P. NAGAR, 2ND PHASE, BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. 2. SRI. JAGADISH S/O LATE KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.542, KALIKANAGAR, ANDHRAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-91. …RESPONDENTS (R1-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7145 WP No. 48059 of 2017 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2017. Now we are in the month of February 2025. The petition is pending from eight years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5