APHC010441452018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI WRIT PETITION Between: Sri. B. Rama Mohan Sai The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMA MURTY P V S A Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAVITEJA PADIRI 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20529/2018 Sri. B. Rama Mohan Sai ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMA MURTY P V S A Counsel for the Respondent(S): RAVITEJA PADIRI GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: [3396] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not reinstating me in pursuant to the Clause 4 and 5 of the GO MS NO 138 Finance HR IV Department dated 08082017 despite representations dated 07012018 29 012018 14022018 and 05042018 as arbitrary illegal capricious and contrary to GO MS No 138 Dated 08082017 apart from violative of Articles 14 16 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to continue with the services of the Writ Petitioner till 60 years in pursuant to the clause 4 and 5 of GO MS No 138 dated 08082017 including grant of arrears of salary to the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition It in the interest of justice and pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development on behalf of the respondents are in attendance. 3. Ms.B.Poojitha, learned counsel would submit that Sri Ravi Teja Padiri, learned counsel has given no objection and his name may be deleted. Registry is directed to delete the name of Sri Ravi Teja Padiri, learned counsel for respondent No.4. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner retired from service on 13.6.2016. Thereafter, by virtue of G.O.Ms.No.138 Finance (HR.IV) Department dated 08.08.2017, age of retirement is increased from 58 years to 60 years, for which the petitioner has submitted several representations dated 07.01.2018, 29.01.2018, 14.02.2018 and 05.04.2018 to the respondent authorities to consider his representations. After filing of the present writ petition, the petitioner has completed 60 years. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the respondent No.4 to consider the representations of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.4 to consider the representations of the petitioner and pass appropriate order according to the governing rules in law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 24.3.2024 TJN 186 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20529 OF 2018 Dated: 24.03.2025 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Writ Petition No.20529 of 2018 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 03. 24.03.2025 Dr.VJP, J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide Separate Order) _________ Dr.VJP, J TJN