Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30606 (KAR)

SRI N KRISHNAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/19464/2025 · 2025-07-07

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24405 WP No. 19464 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 19464 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI N KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, S/O LATE NANJAPPA, R/AT NO.66, BYANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKAJALA, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU-562 157. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. BRUNDHA G., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAMESHA T.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, D.C. COMPOUND, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU-562 157. 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24405 WP No. 19464 of 2025 AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562 157. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-562 157. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, BANGALORE NORTH ADDI TALUK, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-562 157. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22.09.2016 FOR CONDUCTING PHODY DURASTI IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER'S LAND BEARING SY.NO.25, MEASURING 24 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT BYANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24405 WP No. 19464 of 2025 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking to direct the respondent-authorities to consider the representation dated 22.09.2016 to conduct Phodi and Durasth in respect of the subject land concerned. 4. In that view of the matter, it is open for the petitioner to make online application seeking similar relief before the competent statutory authorities. 5. If such an application is made through online, the same shall be considered by the respondent- authorities in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE JT/- CT:SM