[2025:RJ-JP:38723] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 11899/2025 Akhtar @ Mittal S/o Mangal, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Village Palpur, Police Station Shekhpur Ahir, District Khairthal Tijara. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 20/09/2025 1. This second bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.83/2025, registered with the Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar for offences under Sections 121(1), 132 & 109(1) of BNS, under Sections 19 & 54 of Rajasthan Excise Act, under Sections 3/25 & 3/27 of the Arms Act and under Sections 5, 6, 8 & 9 of the RBA Act, 1995. 2. The first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 13.06.2025. 3. Heard. 4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel appearing for the petitioner so also the fact that no criminal case [2025:RJ-JP:38723] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11899/2025] has been registered against the petitioner since 2013 and there is no allegation against him of causing any injury to the complainant party and the petitioner is in custody since 25.03.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before the trial Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is also made clear that if in future the petitioner is found to be involved in any criminal case of similar nature, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of this order. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/Satyendra/2