APHC010442542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23173/2025 Between: 1. V MALLIKARJUNA RAO, S/O. V. KRISHNA MUITHY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 10-107, TURAKAPLEM VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, (NOW MACHALIPATNAM DISTRICT.) ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, NOW MACHALIPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, NOW MACHALIPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PENAMALURU POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT, NOW MACHALIPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. YANAGUNURU SHASHANK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23173 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue any writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not registering the crime basing on the petitioner's reports Dt-.04-02-2025 and 17-02-2025 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 4th respondent to register a crime basing on his reports Dt.04-02-2025 and 17-02- 2025 and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri Y. Shashank, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the subject matter is pertaining to civil disputes between the petitioner and the private parties. The police are not interfering in the civil disputes between parties. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout his remedy before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.09.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23173 of 2025 Dated.08.09.2025 TVN 114