$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 14727/2024 RAMAN VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dheeraj Sharma, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus CANARA BANK AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Poorvi, Advocate for R-1 Ms. Meenakshi Vimal, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 17.03.2025 CM APPL. 15385/2025 (for modification of names of counsels for R-2 in order dated 27.02.2025) 1. The present application has been filed seeking modification/correction of order dated 27.05.2024. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 2 submits that in the aforesaid order her name has been wrongly mentioned. Further, the appearance of her two associates who had appeared along with her, has not been recorded. 3. Issue notice. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner affirms the fact that Ms. Paromita Majumdar, Advocate had appeared on behalf of respondent no. 2 along with her two associates. 4. In view of the above, the correct name of the learned counsel for This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/03/2025 at 11:40:27 respondent no. 2 i.e. Ms. Paromita Majumdar, Advocate be read in the appearance recorded on 27.02.2025. Likewise, appearance of her two associates, namely, Ms. Meenakshi Vimal and Mr. Jayant Rao, Advocates shall be read into the said order. 5. With the aforesaid correction, the application stands disposed of. CM APPL. /2025 (to be numbered) 6. The present application has been filed vide Diary No. E-1800386/2025 by respondent no. 1 seeking modification of order dated 27.02.2025. 7. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 submits that inadvertently appearance of Ms. Rajul Jain, Advocate and her associate Ms. Poorvi, Advocate, has inadvertently not recorded in the order dated 27.02.2025 although they had appeared and assisted the Court on the said date. 8. Issue notice. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/non-applicant accepts notice and does not dispute the above position. Accordingly, it is ordered that the appearance of Ms. Rajul Jain, Advocate and Ms. Poorvi, Advocate for respondent no. 1 shall be read into the order dated 27.02.2025. 9. The application stands disposed of. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J MARCH 17, 2025 ‘rs’ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/03/2025 at 11:40:27