IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY. THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 22567 OF 2024 Between: 1. G. Dhanunjaya Reddy, S/o. G. Venkateswara Reddy Aged about 33 years, R/o. Yerradoddi Village, Kodumur Mandal, Kurnool District. 2. K Kesalu, S/o. K Venkataswamy, Aged about 30 years R/o. Uyyalawada Village, Orvakal Mandal, Kurnool District. 3. B. Neelakantheswara Singh. S/o. B. Balaji Singh, Aged about 38 R/o. Penchikalapadu village, Gudur mandal, Kurnool District. 4. V.Veera Prathap, S/o. V.Beechupalli, Aged about 32 years, R/o. Polakal Village, C Belagal Mandal, Kurnool District. 5. K. Ashok Kumar, S/o. K Rami Reddy, Aged about 30 years, R/o. Shram Nagar, B Camp, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 6. K Naveen Kumar Reddy, S/o. K Damodar Reddy, Aged about 34 years, R/o. Tangutur, Banaganapalli, Kurnool District. 7. P.Jagadeesh, S/o. P.Sai Krishna, Aged about 31 Bhanumukkala, Pamulapadu, Kurnool District. 8. B. Sreenivasulu, S/o. B.B Venkateswarlu, Aged about 33 years R/o. Chinna Tekuru Village, Kallur Mandal, Kurnool District. 9. T. Nikileswara Reddy, S/o. Srinivasa Reddy, Aged about 28 years, R/o. Syamala Nagar, NCC Canteen, B camp, Kurnool, Kurnool District. years. years, R/o. ...PETITIONERS 0 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool. 4. The District SC Welfare and Empowerment Officer, Kurnool District, Kurnool. 5. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Mandal Praja Parishad, Kallur Mandal, Kurnool District. 6. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Mandal Praja Parishad, Orvakal Mandal, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 3 Respondent Authority in Rc.No.A2/92/2024, dated 19.09.2024 transferring the petitioners from their present places to other places as arbitrary, illegal, null and void, against the Norms of Public Policy and Principles of Natural Justice and contrary to the G.O.Ms.No.75 Finance (HR.I-PLG. and Policy) Department, dated 17.08.2024 and Circular No.249/F/GSWS/2024, dated 23.08.2024 and to set aside the same and to issue a consequential direction directing the Respondent Authorities to permit the petitioners to continue to work at the places where they are presently working. rd ^ lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings of the 3'"^ Respondent Authority Rc.No.A2/92/2024, dated 19.09.2024, by permitting the petitioners to continue to work at the places where they are presently working as Welfare and Education Assistant, pending disposal of the above writ petition. in Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3 : GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 4 : GP FOR SERVICES III Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6 : SMT. B.V. APARNA LAKSHMI, SC FOR MPDO The Court made the following: ORDER f / f APHC010441692024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 22567/2024 Between: G. Dhanunjaya Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GPFOR SERVICES IV 2.GP FOR SERVICES II 3.GP FOR SERVICES I 4.B VAPARNALAKSHMI The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 2 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Services I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Two CCs to GP for Services III, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. One CC to Smt. B.V. Aparna Lakshmi, SC for MPDO (OPUC) 5. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:19/06/2025 2 5 JUN 2025 ORDER t; m CO WP.No.22567 of 2024 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS