1 2025:CGHC:29219 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 935 of 2025 • Virendra Dubey S/o Chandrika Dubey Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Panchampur, P.S. Ranka, District Gadwa Jharkhand At Present Address Mandir Hasaud, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus • State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Mandir Hasaud, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : Mr. Pushpendra Kuam Patel, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 30/06/2025 1. The applicant has preferred this application under Section 482 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for grant of Anticipatory Bail, apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.771/2024, registered at Police Station – Mandir Hasaud District – Raipur (C.G.) for the alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 316(3) of BNS, 2023. 2. The case of the prosecution is nutshell in that, the complainant has made written complaint to the concerned police station is that the driver and owner has rigging the sponge iron of the complainant’s. VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA 2 Based upon the such complaint, the police has registered the case under Section 316(3) of BNS against the applicant. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the police has not seized any article from the possession of the applicant with regard to subject article an only on the basis of merely suspicious and memorandum statement. He also submits that the material available on record. Prima facie case is not made out against the present applicant. Therefore, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the present applicant. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant and submits that applicant has no criminal antecedent but looking to the conduct of the applicant, he is not entitled for grant of anticipatory bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of dispute and material available in the case diary, it transpires from the record is that the applicant was driver and he has rigging the sponge iron of the complainant, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail. 7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant– Virendra Dubey filed under Section 482 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 involved in Crime No.771/2024, registered at Police Station – Mandir Hasaud District – Raipur (C.G.) for the 3 alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 316(3) of BNS, 2023, is rejected. sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaishali