CWP-6973-2019 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 111+256 MEHAR SINGH AND ANR. Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: Mr. for the petitioners. Ms. Komal Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) CM No.4285-CWP of 2025 The present application has rendered infructuous as already listed for today itself. Ordered accordingly. CM No.20415-CWP of 202 For the Replication to the written statement filed by the official respondents is taken on record. Main case [1]. By way of present petition, petitioners seek issuance of an appropriate direction to the official respondents to release amount of compensation for the acquisition of plot owned by the petitioners measuring 163 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.4285 CWP No.6973 of Date of Decision: MEHAR SINGH AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Dilbagh Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Komal Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) CWP of 2025 The present application has rendered infructuous as already listed for today itself. Ordered accordingly. CWP of 2023 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Replication to the written statement filed by the official respondents is taken on By way of present petition, petitioners seek issuance of an appropriate direction to the official respondents to release amount of compensation for the acquisition of plot owned by the petitioners measuring 163 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.4285-CWP of 2025 in/and CWP No.6973 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision:13.08.2025 ......Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Komal Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana. The present application has rendered infructuous as the main case is reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Replication to the written statement filed by the official respondents is taken on By way of present petition, petitioners seek issuance of an appropriate direction to the official respondents to release amount of compensation for the acquisition of plot owned by the petitioners measuring 163-1/3 square yards each 1 the main case is reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Replication to the written statement filed by the official respondents is taken on By way of present petition, petitioners seek issuance of an appropriate direction to the official respondents to release amount of compensation for the 1/3 square yards each MOHMED ATIK 2025.08.13 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment CWP-6973-2019 (O&M) forming part of Killa/Khasra No.51/21 situated within the area of Mauja Pada Sindhu Colony, Rohtak. [2]. Learned was acquired vide Notification dated 01.01.2002 issued under Section 4 followed by Notification dated 30.12.2002 issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Thereafter award was passed on 29.12.2004. It has also been pointed out by learned State counsel received by each and having failed to invoke their remedies under Sections 18 and 28 Acquisition Act, 1894, no further compensation can be released [3]. I have heard learned counsel for paper book. [4]. As a matter of fact in terms of acquisition of land owned by the petitioners, the amount of compensation under the award under Section 11 of the Act was received by them on 21.02.2009 and having failed to remedies as stipulated under Sections 18 and 28 petition cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the same stands dismissed, however, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail the aforementioned remedies, accordance with law. [5]. Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of. August 13, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable (O&M) forming part of Killa/Khasra No.51/21 situated within the area of Mauja Pada Sindhu Colony, Rohtak. Learned State counsel submits that the land was acquired vide Notification dated 01.01.2002 issued under Section 4 followed otification dated 30.12.2002 issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Thereafter award was passed on 29.12.2004. It has also been pointed by learned State counsel that the compensation amount of Rs.13,611/ received by each of the petitioners vide two different cheques dated 21.02.2009 and having failed to invoke their remedies under Sections 18 and 28 Acquisition Act, 1894, no further compensation can be released I have heard learned counsel for As a matter of fact in terms of acquisition of land owned by the petitioners, the amount of compensation under the award under Section 11 of the Act was received by them on 21.02.2009 and having failed to remedies as stipulated under Sections 18 and 28 petition cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the same stands dismissed, however, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail the aforementioned remedies, accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of. 5 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No forming part of Killa/Khasra No.51/21 situated within the area of Mauja Pada submits that the land owned by the petitioners was acquired vide Notification dated 01.01.2002 issued under Section 4 followed otification dated 30.12.2002 issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Thereafter award was passed on 29.12.2004. It has also been pointed that the compensation amount of Rs.13,611/- was also of the petitioners vide two different cheques dated 21.02.2009 and having failed to invoke their remedies under Sections 18 and 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, no further compensation can be released to them. the parties and gone through the As a matter of fact in terms of acquisition of land owned by the petitioners, the amount of compensation under the award under Section 11 of the Act was received by them on 21.02.2009 and having failed to invoke the statutory remedies as stipulated under Sections 18 and 28-A of the Act, the present writ petition cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the same stands dismissed, however, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail the aforementioned remedies, Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2 forming part of Killa/Khasra No.51/21 situated within the area of Mauja Pada owned by the petitioners was acquired vide Notification dated 01.01.2002 issued under Section 4 followed otification dated 30.12.2002 issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Thereafter award was passed on 29.12.2004. It has also been pointed was also of the petitioners vide two different cheques dated 21.02.2009 A of the Land the parties and gone through the As a matter of fact in terms of acquisition of land owned by the petitioners, the amount of compensation under the award under Section 11 of the invoke the statutory A of the Act, the present writ petition cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the same stands dismissed, however, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail the aforementioned remedies, in MOHMED ATIK 2025.08.13 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment