Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30578 (AP)

Ms/. Mualikrishna Fertilizers consisting of its Partners v. M/s. Balaji Fertilizer

SA/655/2005 · 2025-07-09

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010441662005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 655/2005 Between: 1. MS/. MUALIKRISHNA FERTILIZERS CONSISTING OF ITS PARTNERS, S. RAJARATHNAM NAIDU, S/O. RAMASWAMY NAIDU NO. 104, G.S. MADA STREET, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. M/S. MUALIKRISHNA FERTILIZERS CONSISTING OF ITS PARTNERS, G.V. KRISHNAMURTHY, S/O. VENKATARATHNAM CHETTY R/O. NO. 114, BERI STREET, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. M/S. MUALIKRISHNA FERTILIZERS CONSISTING OF ITS PARTNERS, C. CHENCHURAMI REDDY, S/O. THIMMA REDDY NO. 104, G.S. MADA STREET, TIRUPATI, C/O. GEETHA LODGE, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER S. RAJARATHNAM NAIDU. 4. S. RAJARATHNAM NAIDU, S/O. RAMASWAMY NAIDU R/O. NO. 104, G.S. MADA STREET, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. M/S BALAJI FERTILIZER, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR B. PEDDABBA NAIDU, S/O. NALLAMA NAIDU BUSINESS R/O. NO. 252, NETHAJI ROAD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. . 2. G SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.655 OF 2005 J U D G M E N T: Learned counsel representing Sri G.Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants would submit that the appellants are no more, having died long ago. None of the legal representatives come forward to prosecute the appeal. 2. Learned counsel representing Sri P.Jagadeesh Chandra Prasad, learned counsel for the respondent is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated by operation of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 10.07.2025 Pmk 29 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.655 OF 2005 Date:10.07.2025 Pmk