Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30565 (CHH)

SMT. PREMLATA SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6329/2025 · 2025-06-25

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:28038 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6325 of 2025 1 - Ashwani Dubey S/o Late Shankar Dayal Dubey Aged About 55 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School, Bahnakadi, Block Arang District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Block Education Officer Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) 2025:CGHC:28040 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6329 of 2025 1 - Smt. Premlata Sahu W/o Manmohan Lal Sahu Aged About 44 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School, Pro. Shivajinagar, Khursipar, Block - Durg, District - Durg (C.G.) Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Division Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 4 - Collector District Durg (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Durg, District - Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) 2025:CGHC:28049 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6399 of 2025 1 - Amar Yadav S/o Chamru Ram Yadav Aged About 40 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School, Gajadharpur, Block Kusmi District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Collector District Balrampur - Ramanujganj (C.G.). 4 - District Education Officer Balrampur- Ramanujganj, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj (C.G.) 5 - Block Education Officer Kusmi, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj (C.G.). ... Respondents 3 2025:CGHC:28052 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6414 of 2025 1 - Smt. Salomi Lakra W/o Heran Rakesh Minj Aged About 42 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Darripara Jaynagar, Block Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector District Surajpur Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh 5 - Block Education Officer Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) 2025:CGHC:28053 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6416 of 2025 1 - Smt. Deepti Deshmukh W/o Jitesh Deshmukh Aged About 34 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School, Dongaghat, Block Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 4 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Division Bastar, District- Bastar (C.G.) 4 - Collector District - Bastar (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Bastar, District- Bastar (C.G.) 6 - Block Eduction Officer Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Rupendra Kumar Dewangan, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. S.P. Kale, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyers. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 26-06-2025 1. By way of these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the impugned transfer orders and action of the respondents whereby the petitioners have been declared surplus Teachers and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners and if the petitioners are not granted interim relief, they will suffer with irreparable loss. Therefore, the impugned orders are liable to be set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records the petitioners have been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that if the petitioners are having any grievance, they may move fresh 5 representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on their representation(s) in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners are directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today and thereafter the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of five days from the date of receipt of representation(s) in accordance with law in objective manner. Till representation of petitioners are decided, there shall be status quo as it exists today so far as transfer of present petitioners are concerned. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil