Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 778 of 2025 Court No. - 44 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have become infructuous by efflux of time, it, is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. May 7, 2026 Atul K. Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Zunaid Khan, Pulkit, Pusp Raj Singh, Rajesh Singh, Sanjeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.) Badelal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad