Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30557 (JHR)

FIROJ ANSAERI @ FIROZ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./8200/2024 · 2025-01-14

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.8200 of 2024 ------ 1. Firoj Ansari @ Firoz Ansari, aged about 32 years S/O Serajuddin. 2. Mumtaz Ansari, aged about 47 years S/O Gafur Ansari. 3. Sharjahan Bibi, aged about 54 years W/O Janat Hussain. 4. Leyakat Ansari, aged about 48 years S/O Rafik Ansari, All R/O Village- Lawahi Kalan, P.O. & P.S.- Dandai, District- Garhwa (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Jamila Bibi W/o- Tayab Ansari, R/o Village- Lawahi, P.O. + P.S.- Dandai, District- Garhwa .... .... .... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Md. Sajid Yunus, Advocate For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 14-01-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.193 of 2024 instituted under Sections 147/452/427/504/506/149 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners being the agnates have been disturbing, harassing and assaulting the complainant time and again. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that only to harass the petitioners, this false case has been foisted against the petitioners. It is also submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the complainant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Garhwa in connection with Complaint Case No.193 of 2024 with the condition that they will co- operate with the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the complainant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/