APHC010447052025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Saturday, the thirtieth The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Criminal Between: Nakkala Thulasamma and others The State, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the petitioner: 1. V.Dushyanth Reddy Counsel for the respondents: NIL The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) thirtieth day of August two thousand and twenty five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Criminal Petition No: 8837 of 2025 kkala Thulasamma and others … Petitioners/A-1 to A and The State, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, and others ...Respondents/Complainant Counsel for the petitioner: Reddy Counsel for the respondents: The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] day of August two thousand and twenty five 1 to A-4 /Complainant 2 Crl.P.No.8837 of 2025 O R D E R: This criminal petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to quash the proceedings against the petitioners No.1 to 4 / A-1 to A-4 in Crime No.81 of 2025 of Vayalpad P.S., Annamayya District, for offences under Sections 336(3), 340(2), 351(2) r/w 3(5) of B.N.S. 2. The case of the petitioners is briefly as follows: The respondent No.2, U.Ramesh Babu, lodged a complaint on 09.08.2025 to the effect that on 12.11.2020, K.Siva Prakash had gifted his land measuring of Ac.1.41 ½ cents to Sri Srinivasa Charitable Trust, Vayalpad, through a registered gift deed and on 27.11.2020; that K.Siva Prakash had bequeathed his house vide D.No.5-5 to Sri Srinivasa Charitable Trust through a will (veelunama); that on 15.12.2020, A-1 Nakkala Thulasamma, A-2 Nakkala Venkataswamy and A-3 P.Pawan Kumar had created a forged partition deed at Sub-Registar’s office in Madanapalli with the help of A-4 Rajendra (document writer) and got registered the land and house in the name of A-1 Nakkala Thulasamma by using forged thumb impressions of K.Siva Prakash; and that in the month of July, 2025, when the trust members visited the land and house, A-1 to A-3, stating that the land belonged to them and had threatened that if anyone enters into the land, they will kill them. 3. Ms. K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent No.1, submitted that Section 35(3) of B.N.S.S. would be followed as the offences covered by the F.I.R. are within the scope of it. 4. As such, the learned counsel for the petitioners requested to dispose of the criminal petition recording the same. 5. In the result, the petition is disposed of directing the Station House Officer concerned to follow Section 35(3) of the B.N.S.S. 3 Crl.P.No.8837 of 2025 There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ B. S. BHANUMATHI, J Dt.30.08.2025 PNV