1 2025:CGHC:27974 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3233 of 2025 1 - Sindhulal S/o Late Purn Chandra Aged About 78 Years Occupation - Agriculturist, R/o - Badhaipara, Sariya Tahsil - Sariya, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 2 - Rishiram Pradhan S/o Arjun Pradhan Aged About 67 Years Occupation - Agriculturist, R/o - Badhaipara, Sariya Tahsil - Sariya, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 3 - Rambha Sidar W/o Vishnu Sidar Aged About 75 Years Occupation - Housewife, R/o - Badhaipara, Sariya Tahsil - Sariya, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 4 - Vahak Sidar S/o Jagmohan Sidar Aged About 80 Years Occupation - Agriculturist, R/o - Badhaipara, Sariya Tahsil - Sariya, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - Santosh Pradhan S/o Bihari Pradhan Aged About 49 Years Occupation - Agriculturist, R/o - Badhaipara, Sariya Tahsil - Sariya, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - Katiyabai W/o Late Shoukilal Aged About 76 Years Occupation - Agriculturist, R/o - Badhaipara, Sariya Tahsil - Sariya, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 7 - Sankirtan S/o Mahoday Aged About 68 Years Occupation - Agriculturist, R/o - Parasrampur, Tahsil - Sariya, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 8 - Parasram Barik S/o Dayanidhi Barik Aged About 70 Years Occupation - Agriculturist, R/o - Parasrampur, Tahsil - Sariya, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 9 - Amarsingh Tandon S/o Khageshwar Tandon Aged About 55 Years VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.06.27 10:55:45 +0530 2 Occupation - Agriculturist, R/o - Ambedkarnagar, Sariya Tahsil - Sariya, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 10 - Dhruv Sidar S/o Nrip Sidar Aged About 65 Years Occupation - Agriculturist, R/o - Sanwarapara, Sariya Tahsil - Sariya, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 11 - Harishankar Bhoye S/o Narad Bhoye Aged About 55 Years Occupation - Agriculturist, R/o - Tatla, Tahsil And P/s Pussour, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector District Sarangarh Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Tahsil And District - Sarangarh Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh 4 - The Tahsildar Tahsil Sariya District Sarangarh Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Abhishek Saraf, Advocate For State : Mr. Anurag Tripathi, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 26/06/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner on the following relief(s) : “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent's authority to grant /disburse the amount of compensation under the Right to Fair 3 Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, with interest and entire consequential benefits forthwith/or/ within stipulated time period. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the respondent's authorities to decide the petitioner representation and claim positively within stipulated time period. 10.3 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in favour of the petitioner may kindly be passed.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the construction work of about 500 meters of the said road was objected and stopped by the petitioners and other group of people. The main road behind the lands of the petitioners, the land of their ownership, were being affected by the construction of the said road. Neither the lands of the petitioners were legally acquired nor the compensation of their respective lands were given to them till date. The Right to Property is a Constitutional Right provided under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India. He further submits that demarcation, survey report and panchnama attached with the petition are in favour of the petitioners showing their legal ownership over the said lands, but 4 till date, petitioners have been deprived from the compensation. He further submits that the petitioners have also submitted their joint representation as well as individual representation for their grievances in Jandarshan Camp under Sushashan Tihar conducted by the respondent No.2, but no response was given on that representation till date. 3. Learned counsel for the State contended that after verification of the facts, respondent authorities are ready to decide the representation of the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition stands disposed of directing to respondent authorities that after verification of the facts of the case consider and decide the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, as per rule, regulations and law. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant