IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203 KRISHAN KUMAR TANEJA STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Ms. S.S. Salar, Advocate Ms. Arundhati Kulshres Mr. Saksham Khunger, Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for th obtain instructions from the The Pending 15.09.2025 SwarnjitS Whether Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6587-2001 DATE OF DECISION: KRISHAN KUMAR TANEJA Versus PUNJAB HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. Hiten Chugh, Advocate for Ms. S.S. Salar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Saksham Khunger, Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate for ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) earned counsel for the petitioner obtain instructions from the petitioner to pursue the The petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution at this stage. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) (DEEPAK MANCHANDA Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2001 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 15.09.2025 … Petitioner (s) ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL DEEPAK MANCHANDA for the petitioner. tha, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Saksham Khunger, Advocate and for respondent No.2. e petitioner submits that he is not able to to pursue the petition. stands dismissed for want of prosecution at this stage. also stands disposed of. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No ... Respondent(s) submits that he is not able to SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.09.15 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document