CWP-18061-2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 456 Parkash Kaur State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: None Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made regularize the services of the petitioner. 2. In the index of the petition, reference was made to CWP-12560-2004, titled as came to be disposed of by the Division Bench 3. In the order dated 17.04.2006, the Division Bench had directed the listing of the present case with CWP petitions, was disposed of on the statement of learned State counsel made on instructions that most of the petitioners had been regularized, however, liberty was granted to them to revi 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18061 Date of decision: Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition the services of the petitioner. In the index of the petition, reference was made to 2004, titled as Darshan Lal vs. State of Punjab and others came to be disposed of by the Division Bench “Learned Additional Advocate General, on the basis of the written statement, states that the petitioner is at Sr. No.35 in the Seniority List maintained for the purpo the part-time employees, pursuant to the policy of the Government and that the services of the petitioner would be regularized on its turn. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of accordingly.” In the order dated 17.04.2006, the Division Bench had directed the listing of the present case with CWP-7306-2004, which along with the four other was disposed of on the statement of learned State counsel made on instructions that most of the petitioners had been regularized, however, liberty was granted to them to revive the same, in case need arises IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 18061-2004 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.08.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. in the present petition for directing the respondents to In the index of the petition, reference was made to the pendency of Darshan Lal vs. State of Punjab and others, which on 11.11.2005, which reads thus: “Learned Additional Advocate General, on the basis of the written statement, states that the petitioner is at Sr. No.35 in the Seniority List maintained for the purpose of regularizing time employees, pursuant to the policy of the and that the services of the petitioner would be In view of the above, the petition is disposed of In the order dated 17.04.2006, the Division Bench had directed the 2004, which along with the four other was disposed of on the statement of learned State counsel made on instructions that most of the petitioners had been regularized, however, liberty the same, in case need arises. -1- for directing the respondents to the pendency of which s:- “Learned Additional Advocate General, on the basis of the written statement, states that the petitioner is at Sr. No.35 in e of regularizing time employees, pursuant to the policy of the and that the services of the petitioner would be In view of the above, the petition is disposed of In the order dated 17.04.2006, the Division Bench had directed the 2004, which along with the four other was disposed of on the statement of learned State counsel made on instructions that most of the petitioners had been regularized, however, liberty ASHOK KUMAR 2025.08.20 12:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-18061-2004 -2- 4. In view of the above, the present petition also stands disposed of with the same liberty. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 19.08.2025 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2025.08.20 12:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document