Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
Present: The Hon’ble Justice Debangsu Basak
And The Hon’ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi
M.A.T. 1278 of 2025
Sri Ashutosh Das & Ors. vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. With CAN 1 of 2025
For the Appellants
: Mr. Tapas Kumar Bhattacharya
Mr. Purnasis Bhuniya
For the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. Sobhan Majumder
For the State
: Mr. Swapan Banerjee
Mr. D.N. Banerjee
Heard & Judgment on : August 25, 2025
Debangsu Basak, J.:-
1. Appeal is at the behest of the private respondent and directed against order dated July 29, 2025 passed in W.P.A. No. 15888 of 2025.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the appellants submits that, the appellants received service of the writ petition on July 30, 2025. The impugned order was passed on July 29, 2025. Therefore, according to him, they should be
2
afforded an opportunity of hearing before the learned Single Judge. They seek to canvass various points on merits.
3. State and the private respondent are represented.
4. We enquired learned advocate appearing for the writ petitioner as to the date of service of the writ petition upon the appellants before us.
5. Apparently, the private respondent was served with the copy of the writ petition on July 30, 2025 while the impugned order was passed on July 29,
2025.
6. Purely on the ground that the appellants should be afforded a reasonable opportunity of hearing and since the appellants received the writ petition on July 30, 2025 while the impugned order was passed on July 29, 2025, we set aside the impugned order dated July 29, 2025.
7. We remand W.P.A. 15888 of 2025 for fresh hearing on merits. We clarify that we did not enter into the merits of the rival contentions of the parties.
8. M.A.T. 1278 of 2025 and the connected application being CAN 1 of 2025 are disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.)
9. I agree S.D.
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)