IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.554 of 2019 Decided on : 17.10.2025 __________________________________________________________ Jeet Ram & others .....Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. S.C Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arvind Negi, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr.Navlesh Verma Additional Advocate General for respondent No.1 & 2. : None for respondent No.3. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Instructing Counsel Mr. Arvind Negi appeared along with Senior Counsel, on Instructions, states that due to intervening events, petitioner does not intend to continue with the present proceedings. The statement is taken on record. 2. Prayer is not opposed by Learned State Counsel also. 3. In view of the prayer so made, the petition is 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 disposed of as having become infructuous, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to claim relief with better particulars, if so desires. Pending miscellaneous application (s), if any, shall also stands disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge October 17, 2025 (meera)