Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30534 (RAJ)

RAJ CHRISTIAN CENTRAL ANDANR v. DIRECTOR ELEMENTARY EDUANDANR

CW/23680/2017 · 2025-01-08

Avneesh Jhingan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1072] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23680/2017 1. Rajasthan Christian Central Management Board Of Secondary Education, Ajmer Through Its Chairman Dar, 2/10 C.n.i. Sotion Centre, Infront Of Roadways Bus Stand, Ajmer 2. Mission Primary Vidyalya, Nasirabad Through Its Chairman Darbarasingh S/o Mahendsingh, 2/10 C.n.i. Sotion Centre, Infront Of Roadways Bus Stand, Ajmer ----Petitioners Versus 1. Director Elementary Education, Raj. Bikaner 2. Director, Secondary Education, Raj. Bikaner ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vinod Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr.Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC with Mr.Saumil Sharma & Mr.Uttam Jhajharia HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order 08/01/2025 1. This petition is filed seeking directions to the respondents to release grant-in-aid for the period 1999 to 2009 of the amount of salary paid by the petitioner to its employees. 2. Brief facts are that the petitioner-School is affiliated with the Board of Secondary Education Rajasthan, Ajmer and is receiving 80% grant-in-aid of the approved expenditure from the Government of Rajasthan. The grievance raised in the present petition is for release of grant-in-aid to the tune of Rs.4,62,821/- under the head of fixation and dearness allowance withheld by the respondents. [2025:RJ-JP:1072] (2 of 2) [CW-23680/2017] 3. The respondents in the reply filed submitted that the petitioner had not filed the claim seeking grant-in-aid as per the rules and regulations. 4. In view of the undisputed pleadings in the reply, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file the claim for grant-in-aid for the period 1999-2009 within eight weeks from today. 5. In the eventuality of the claim being filed, the respondents shall consider the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. 6. In case the petitioner is found entitled for the relief, the same shall be released immediately thereafter. (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/69