Panditi Venkata Varaprasad Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/20518/2018 · 2025-07-16
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30533 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30533 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010440882018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION No. 20518/2018 Between:
1. PANDITI VENKATA VARAPRASAD REDDY, S/O.VEMANATH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. PEYYALAPALEM VILLAGE, KODAVALURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DIST. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KODAVALUR P.S., SPSR NELLORE DIST. 4. KARTHAM VENUGOPAL REDDY, S/O. LATE CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YRS, R/O.PEYYALAPALEM VILALLAGE, KODAVALUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DIST. NOW R/O. PLOT NO. 203, JYOTHI LOTUS APARTMENTS, LOTUS POND HUDA HEIGHTS ROOM NO.12, BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD. 5. REGATTA SREELAKSHMI, W/O. DR RAVINDRA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 44 YRS, R/O. DOOR NO. 8-3-945, N/211, SREE NILAYA ENCLAVE, NEW SCIENCE COLLEGE ROAD, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD -73. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing notice under 91 of Cr P C in Crime No. 22/2018 to the petitioner when there is civil dispute is pending vide OS No. 22/2018 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur SPSR Netlore District is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the civil disputes between petitioner and respondents 4 and 5 in the interest of justice and to pass
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. GINJUPALLI SUBBA RAO The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“ ...
to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing notice under 91 of Cr P C in Crime No.22/2018 to the petitioner when there is civil dispute is pending vide OS No.22/2018 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur SPSR Nellore District is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the civil disputes between petitioner and respondents 4 and 5 in the interest of justice and to pass ...”
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on oral instructions would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court on 20.06.2018 in IA No.1 of 2017, Police personnel are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties and that no cause survives in this writ petition and the same may be disposed of. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 20518 of 2018
17.07.2025
Mjl /*