Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30532 (JHR)

NIRANJAN MAHATO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./4342/2019 · 2025-08-14

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:23865] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.4342 of 2019 ------ 1. Niranjan Mahato, aged about 29 years, son of late Jagdish Mahato, 2. Mukteshwar Mahato aged about 43 years, son of Jagdish Mahato 3. Tulsi Mahato @ Tulshi Mahato, aged about 34 years, son of late Prayag Mahato 4. Rameshwar Mahato, aged about 52 years, son of Khelaram Mahato (late). 5. Hari Mahato, aged about 76 years, son of late Rijhu Mahato 6. Lilaram Mahato, aged about 46 years, son of late Jhagu Mahato 7. Bhagirath Mahato, aged about 58 years son of late Khela Ram Mahato 8. Manbhulan Mahato, aged about 54 years, son of late Ashu Mahato All residents of Udayapur, Kalyanpur, P.O. and P.S. Barwadda, District- Dhanbad. 9. Sanjeev Kumar Sinha @ Sanjiv Kr. Sinha, aged about 41 years, son of Jiwan Kishor Prasad, resident of Sijua, Jogta, Fire Project, Chhotanagari, P.O., P.S. and District Dhanbad. 10. Amit Jaiswal, aged about 45 years, son of late Shiv Prasad Jaiswal, resident of Luby Circular Road, MADA Office, Dhanbad, P.O. P.S. & District Dhanbad. 11. Md. Rusltam Ansari @ Rustam Ansari, aged about 52 years, son of late Prakash Ansari, resident of Ena Islampur, P.O. and P.S. Jharia, District- Dhanbad. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Brijnandan Mahato, son of late Kaniaram Mahato, resident of Udaipur Tola Bangalatand, P.O. Kalyanpur, P.S. Barwadda, Dist- Dhanbad. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-04 Dated:-14-08-2025 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State submits that since there is no merit in this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/