Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30531 (CHH)

AMAR SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5633/2023 · 2025-08-28

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:44097 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5633 of 2023 1 - Amar Singh S/o Dharam Kashyap Aged About 61 Years Presently Working As Forest Ranger, Range Office Jagdalpur Production Address-82 Bich Para Upanpal Nagarnar Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Forest Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Astha Shukla, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29.08.2025 1. During the course of hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause of action no longer survives, and in view of subsequent developments, the petition has been rendered infructuous. ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the same and has no objection to the petition being dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, liberty is granted to the respondent State authorities to pass appropriate orders in respect of transfer of the petitioner, in case exigency arises, without being influenced by this order. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena