Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
229 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-7657-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 Darshan Singh ..... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present: Mr. Ashok Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** HARSH BUNGER J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for setting aside order dated 08.03.2019 (Annexure P-2) passed by learned Sub Divisional Canal Officer, Kalanwali, order dated 11.09.2019 (Annexure P-3) passed by learned Divisional Canal Officer, Sirsa and order dated 16.07.2020 (Annexure P-4) passed by learned Superintending Canal Officer, Sirsa, whereby the prayer made by respondent No.5- Maghar Singh for restraining the petitioner from demolishing the watercourse, was allowed.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has informed the Court that during the pendency of these proceedings, the petitioner had submitted an application before the canal authorities seeking change in the alignment of watercourse, whereupon although certain orders were passed, however, the present day status of those proceedings is not known to him. Learned counsel HIMANI GUPTA 2025.09.29 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
for the petitioner very fairly states that since the petitioner has already applied for change in alignment of the watercourse, nothing survives in the instant writ petition and the same be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
4. All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 24.09.2025
(HARSH BUNGER) Himani JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
2. Whether reportable : Yes/No HIMANI GUPTA 2025.09.29 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document