BOJJAGANI VENKATESWARA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/893/2025 · 2025-08-03
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3053 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3053 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010011332025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 893/2025 Between:
BOJJAGANI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. 6-120, RUNNING ROOM CENTER, TADEPALLI, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ERSTWHILE MANGALAGIRI RURAL POLICE STATION, PRESENTLY TADEPALLI POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHETAN PONNURU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents especially Respondent No.3 and 4 in opening and continuing Suspect Sheet against the petitioner on the file of the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to 4 to close the Suspect sheet opened against the petitioner on 26.05.2003.”
2
2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, by way of counter affidavit, would submit that no causes are pending against the Petitioner. It is further stated that, to curtail the commission of further offences by the Petitioner, suspect sheet was opened against him.
3. Sri Chetan Ponnuru, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, the case registered against the Petitioner was ended in acquittal and no cases are pending against him.
4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of and the impugned Suspect Sheet dated 26.05.2003 against the Petitioner is hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:04.08.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.893 of 2025
Dt.04.08.2025
Dinesh