2025:CGHC:28433 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6409 of 2025 Smt. Purnima Sahu W/o Pawan Kumar Sahu Aged About 39 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Middle School Telibandha, Block And District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Division Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Collector District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Tarendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Mayur Khandelwal, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 27.06.2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents whereby the petitioner has been declared surplus Teacher, and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary, as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner, and if the Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.06.28 10:25:49 +0530 Wps 6409 of 2025 2 petitioner is not granted interim relief, he/she will suffer with irreparable loss. Learned counsel would further submit that the petitioner has not joined in his/her transferred place of posting till date. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioner has been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that if the petitioner is having any grievance, he/she may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee, and the Committee will take a decision on his/her representation in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today, and thereafter the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of five days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law in objective manner. Till representation of the petitioner is decided, there shall be status quo as it exists today, so far as transfer of present petitioner is concerned. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma