1 2025:CGHC:27969 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3222 of 2025 Rohit Lal Dadsena S/o Late Shri Lakkhuram Dadsena, Aged About 57 Years Occupation- Society Manager Cum Incharge Paddy Of Procurement Center, Adim Jati Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Kukdur, Redg No. 1965, R/o Village Kukdur, Police Station And Tahsil- Kukdur, District - Kabirdham (C.G.), Mo No. 9981166189 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Co- Operative, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Raipur, Police Station- Rakhi, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 3 - Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited, 6th Floor, Tower-C, Commercial Complex C B D, Sector 21, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipdan Sangh Maryadit Kabirdham District Kabirdham (C.G.) 5 - Deputy Registrar, Co-Operative Societies Kabirdham, Tahsil And District Kabirdham (C.G.) 6 - Food Officer, Collectorate Compound Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 7 - Branch Manager, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Branch Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ---- Respondents VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.06.27 10:55:46 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. A.G along with Ms. Akanksha Verma, PL, Ms. Nupur Trivedi, PL & Mr. Anurag Tripathi, PL For Respondents No.3 & 4 : Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate For Respondent No.7 : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Shashank Thakur, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 26/06/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in W.P.(C) No.2651 of 2025 {Revaram Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others}, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of Revaram Sahu (supra). 2. Learned counsel for the respective respondents have no objection. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Revaram Sahu (supra). 4. A copy of the order passed in Revaram Sahu (supra) be placed in the record of the present writ petition. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant 3