Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3052 (HP)

ANIL KUMAR VASHISHT v. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

CMP/13000/2026 · 2026-06-04

Ranjan Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Anil Kumar Vashisht Vs. Income Tax Officer& Ors. CWP No. 6773 of 2025 [disposed of matter] 04.06.2026 Present: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant- petitioner. M/s. Neeraj Sharma & Ishan Kashyap, Advocates, for the respondents. CMP No. 13000 of 2026 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and original CWP No. 6773 of 2025, after re-calling the order dated 13.11.2025, in view of order dated 10.04.2026 [Annexure A-2] passed by Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 4716 of 2026, titled Income Tax Officer Vs. Tej Partap Singh, is revived to its original status with original number along with applications. 2. Application stands disposed of. CWP No. 6773 of 2025 3. Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within four weeks thereafter. 4. List for consideration on 17.08.2026. CMP No. 8635 of 2025 5. In order dated 10.04.2026 [Annexure A-2] passed in Civil Appeal No.4716 of 2026, titled Income Tax Officer v. Tej Partap Singh, the Apex Court has passed the following direction:- “1 to 26 .............................................… 27. Finally, during the pendency of the writ petitions before the High Courts, there shall be an interim stay of further reassessment/reassessment proceedings pursuant to the impugned notices, subject to such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the High Courts. 28 to 31 ..................................................” 6. In view of above, said interim protection granted by Apex Court is extendable in present case also. Ordered accordingly. 7. Application stands disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 04th June, 2026 (Shamsh Tabrez)