Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30515 (CHH)

PROMOD KUMAR BUXY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/621/2025 · 2025-06-29

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:28866 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 621 of 2025 1 - Promod Kumar Buxy S/o Late Venkat Lal Buxy Aged About 68 Years R/o House No. 13 Ghotiya Road, Ward No. 26, Kawardha, Distt - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 2 - Ram Pal Singh S/o Lt. Dhur Singh Thakur Aged About 60 Years R/o House No. 13/k Ghotiya Road, Shiv Manidr Ke Samane, Kawardha, Distt - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 3 - Komal Gandhi W/o Harish Chand Gandhi Aged About 45 Years R/o House No. 06 Kk Ghotiya Road, Ward No. 26, Kawardha, Distt - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 4 - Abida Parvin W/o Haider Ali Aged About 59 Years R/o House No. 05 Village Kawardha, Tahsil - Kawardha, Distt - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 5 - Shiv Kumar Sahu S/o Alakh Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o House No. 63, Mahamaya Para, Karesara, Kawardha, Distt - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur Distt - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Kawardha, Distt - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kawardha, Distt - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 4 - Executive Officer Public Work Department, Kawardha, Distt - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 2 5 - Municipal Council Kawardha Through Its Chief Municipal Officer, Kawardha, Distt - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 6 - Tehsildar Kawardha, Distt - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Ankita Shukla, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Swajeet Singh Ubeja, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 30/06/2025 1. This MCC has been filed for restoration of WPC No. 2942 of 2025, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by this Court vide order dated 16.06.2025. 2. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned therein, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for restoration of WPC No. 2942 of 2025,. 3. Accordingly this MCC is allowed. Registry is directed to restore WPC No. 2942 of 2025 to its original number. SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima