ADITYA BIRLA CAPITAL LIMITED v. PRESIDIUM EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST AND OTHERS
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/791/2025 · 2025-09-22
Amit Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30505 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30505 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 791/2025 p. 1 $~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 791/2025 ADITYA BIRLA CAPITAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nikita Rathi, Mr. Debarshi Dutta and Ms. Manvi Adlakha, Advocates. versus PRESIDIUM EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 26.09.2025
1. This matter is listed today for directions upon request by the counsel for the applicant.
2. It has been pointed out by the counsel for the applicant that name of the respondent mentioned in the short cause title in the order dated 22nd September, 2025 should read as Aditya Birla Capital Limited versus Presidium Educational Institution Private Limited.
3. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to amend the cause title as reflected above.
4. Consequently, in paragraphs 2 and 3 of order dated 22nd September, 2025, respondent no. 1 should read as “Presidium Educational Institution Private Limited” instead of “Presidium Educational Charitable Trust”. Paragraphs 2 to 3 of the aforesaid order are revised in following terms: This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2025 at 12:15:57
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 791/2025 p. 2 “2. The learned counsel for respondent no. 5 (Presidium Educational Charitable Trust) who appears virtually on advance notice does not oppose the prayer made in the petition.
3. The applicant's counsel submits that respondent no. 4 has been proceeded ex parte before the Arbitral Tribunal and has also not entered appearance before this Court despite advance service. Further, respondents no. 1 to 3 are facing CIRP proceedings before the learned National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). None appears for them, despite advance service to the RP (ashok.arora79@yahoo.com).”
5. It is ordered accordingly.
AMIT BANSAL, J SEPTEMBER 26, 2025 Rzu This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2025 at 12:15:57