SURESH KUMAR BUNKER AND ANR v. STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ORS
CW/22913/2017 · 2025-08-14
Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30498 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30498 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31922] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 22913/2017
1. Suresh Kumar Bunker S/o Shri Mohan Lal Bunker, Resident Of Village Guda Surjan, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur Raj.
2. Rameshwar Prasad Yadav S/o Late Shri Ramchandra Yadav, Resident Of Village Guda Surjan, Post Jalsu, Via. Jahota, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur Raj. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan Through The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Jaipur Rajasthan.
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur Rajasthan
5. Panchayat Elementary Education Officer, Gram Panchayat Jhalsu, Panchayat Samiti Jhalsu, District Jaipur Rajasthan
6. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Jhalsu, District Jaipur Rajasthan.
7. The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Jhalsu, Panchayat Samiti Jhalsu, District Jaipur Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Iliyas Khan on behalf of Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 14/08/2025 Matter comes up on an application (IA No.1/2024) filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for taking the subsequent developments on record.
[2025:RJ-JP:31922] (2 of 2) [CW-22913/2017] The counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the
order dated 08.12.2022 (Annexure MA/1 colly) annexed with this application (IA No.1/2024), whereby both the petitioners have been appointed to the post of ‘Vidhyalaya Sahayak’; the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Heard. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, since both the petitioners have been appointed to the post of ‘Vidhyalaya Sahayak’ vide order dated 08.12.2022 (Annexure MA/1 colly), the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/23