[2025:RJ-JP:39513] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 2553/2025 Mohammed Sameer S/o Siddik, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Odpura Basti Thana Kotwali District Baran. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota) ----Accused-Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. -----Respondent 2. Satish Kumar S/o Gopal Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ramdev Ji Ka Mohalla Sultanpur Thana Sultanpur Kota Rural Rajasthan. ----Complainant/Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 24/09/2025 1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14(A)(2) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act being aggrieved of the order dated 08.09.2025 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Kota in Bail Application No.162/2025 rejecting the bail application preferred on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.87/2025 registered at Police Station Sultanpur, District Kota Rural for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 189(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment 2015). Later on, police filed charge sheet in this matter. [2025:RJ-JP:39513] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-2553/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that statement of the victim would reveal that alleged incident took place in the spur of moment on account of road accident. He further submits that none of the injuries sustained to the injured have been opined as dangerous to life. He argues that charge-sheet has already been filed; there are no criminal antecedents against the appellant and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that appellant is in custody since 03.06.2025 and further custody of the appellant would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for bail made in this appeal. He submits that complainant/victim of this case has been duly informed about hearing of this criminal appeal. 4. Despite information, no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant. 5. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the appellant, especially considering the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet; role attributed to the appellant; nature of injuries; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:39513] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-2553/2025] 7. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 08.09.2025 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Kota is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant- Mohammed Sameer S/o Siddik arrested in connection with aforesaid FIR No.87/2025 registered at Police Station Sultanpur, District Kota Rural shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant criminal appeal and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/256