- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23824 CRL.RP No. 1184 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 1184 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SRI. SIDDALINGE GOWDA @ PUTTASWAMY S/O SRI REVANNA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT AGRAHARA D CHANGAVI POST C S PURA GUBBI TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 216. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MUNIRAJA M, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. H.N. MANJUNATH, S/O SRI NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT No. 15, 11TH CROSS HOYSALA NAGAR, SUNKADAKATTE BENGALURU – 560 091. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI OMKARESHA, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 18.10.2022 PASSED BY THE 36TH ADDITIONAL CMM, BENGALURU IN C.C.No.28029/2019 AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.07.2023 PASSED BY THE 55tH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23824 CRL.RP No. 1184 of 2023 IN CRL.A.No.1362/2022 AND BE PLEASED TO ACQUIT THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner present. Learned counsel for respondent absent. 2. A joint memo signed by petitioner, respondent and their respective counsel is filed. The joint memo reads as under: “The petitioner and respondent above named most respectfully submits as follows: In the above criminal revision petition the Petitioner has challenged the Judgment dated 18.07.2023 in Criminal Appeal No.1362/2022 passed by the Hon'ble City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru and consequently the Judgment and Sentence dated 18.10.2022 in CC No.28029/2019 passed by the Hon'ble XXXVI AddI. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23824 CRL.RP No. 1184 of 2023 Bengaluru, for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. During pendency of the above petition, at the intervention of elders and well-wishers the dispute between the parties is settled out of the Court, and there is no any claim against the Petitioner by Respondent in view of the said settlement. Therefore, both parties are decided to file this Joint Memo to dispose the above petition as settled out of the Court. Hence, it is respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to take this Joint Memo on record and dispose the above petition in terms of this Joint Memo, in the interest of justice and equity. In view of the joint memo, this revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13