[2025:RJ-JP:39781] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 11814/2025 Ramkhiladi S/o Shri Shankar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Khokhalya, Police Station Banetha, District Tonk At Present Resident Of Mahveerpura, P.S. Nainva, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 26/09/2025 1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.202/2025 registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawaimadhopur for the offence punishable under Section 305(a) of BNS, 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 22.08.2025. Now, this second bail application has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate. He further [2025:RJ-JP:39781] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11814/2025] submits that charge-sheet has already been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that petitioner is a habitual offender as thirteen other cases have been registered against him. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the second bail application. 7. This second bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Ramkhiladi S/o Shri Shankar shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. [2025:RJ-JP:39781] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11814/2025] The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station in first week of every month, till trial is concluded. It is further directed that petitioner shall share his mobile number (in use) to the trial Court and Investigating Agency and he shall not switch off his phone for longer period. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 10. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 11. Office is directed to send copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 12. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/59