CHITARANJAN KHOSALA v. USHA PADHEE,PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ODISHA, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CONTC/6257/2025 · 2026-01-09
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3049 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3049 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.6257 of 2025 Chitaranjan Khosala ..... Petitioner
Represented by Adv. – Mr. Dhiren Chaudhury -versus- Usha Padhee, Principal Secretary to Government of Odisha, Housing and Urban Development Department at Kharvel Bhawan, Bhubaneswar and others. ..... Opposite Parties/ Contemnors Represented by Adv. – Mr. U.R. Jena, ASC
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORDER 09.01.2026
Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
2. It is alleged by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the order dated 30.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C). No.11501 of 2025 having been duly communicated to the Opposite Parties-Contemnors, as it appears from postal tracking report under Annexure-2 to the contempt application, however, the Opposite Parties-Contemnors have not implemented the same. In such view of the matter, learned counsel for the Petitioner alleged wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order which makes the Opposite Parties-Contemnors liable to be proceeded under the Contempt
Page 2 of 2. of Court’s Act.
3.
Learned counsel for the Contemnors, on the other hand, sought for some time to implement the order of this Court in the event the same attains finality.
4. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties, as a last chance, this Court grants further two months’ time to the Contemnors to implement the order dated 30.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C). No.11501 of 2025, failing which, the Contemnors shall be asked to appear in person before this Court and to explain as to why a proceeding under the Contempt of Courts Act shall not be initiated against them for wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order.
5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the contempt petition is disposed of.
( A.K. Mohapatra)
Judge Debasis