IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 220/1 ARB-239-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.07.2025 M/s ABW Suncity …Applicant Versus Mukesh Mangla …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Yaseen Sethi, Advocate for Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Advocate for the applicant *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. Through instant application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘1996 Act’), the applicant is seeking appointment of an Arbitrator. 2. The applicant has failed to serve the respondent though a period of four years from the date of notice has passed away. This Court does not find it appropriate to keep the matter in abeyance. 3. In the backdrop, the present application stands disposed of with liberty to the applicant to furnish latest address of the respondent with an undertaking that it is able to serve the respondent. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 21.07.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.07.22 09:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.