Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.73 of 2025 Date of Decision: 05.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Yashpal Singh Sisodia …….Petitioners Versus The Additional Chief Secretary & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathour, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 23.07.2025, enclosing therewith certain documents suggestive of the fact that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed stands complied with.
2. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with.
3. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, Government has issued Notification under Section 11 of Right to Fair Compensation and 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, (in short “Act”) which has been published on 18.07.2025 in the newspaper (Punjab Kesri) for publicity (Annexure R-II colly).
2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that consequent action, pursuant to Notification under Section 11 of the Act, is taken expeditiously, preferably within two weeks from today so that land acquisition proceedings are concluded, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings.
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 05, 2025 (sunil)