1 2025:CGHC:38040 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6431 of 2025 1 - Ravishankar Mishra S/o Ramvilash Mishra Aged About 52 Years Presently Working As Teacher (LB) At Govt. Middle School Indarpur, Block Odagi, District Surajpur (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Joint Director Education Division Sarguja, District Sarguja (C.G.). 4 - Collector District Surajpur (C.G.). 5 - District Education Officer Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.). 6 - Block Education Officer Odagi, District Surajpur (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri Tapan Kumar Chandra, Advocate. For State : Shri Keshav Gupta, Govt. Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 01.08. 202 5 1. Challenge in this petition is the exparte order of relieving dated 06.06.2025 issued by the respondent No.6. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner who is a Teacher (T Cadre) was posted at Govt. Middle School Indarpur, Block Odgi and has been posted at Middle School Archoka, Block Pratappur, District Surajpur vide order dated 04.06.2025 under the 2 Rationalization Instructions dated 02.08.2024 but the order dated 04.06.2025 has not been communicated to the petitioner and he has directly been relieved from the school vide order dated 06.06.2025. The counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner has has already moved his representation on 09.06.2025 raising his grievances before the Collector, Surajpur, against the exparte relieving order but the same has not been considered till date and therefore the authorities may be directed to consider his representation in accordance with law. 3. On the other hand, the counsel for the State though opposes the petition on merits, however he submits that he has no objection if a direction is being issued to the respondent authorities to decide the pending representation of the petitioner in accordance with law. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of directing the District Level Rationalization Committee to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 09.06.2025 in accordance with law as early as possible. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order to District Level Rationalization Committee within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder