Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010257412025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6902/2025 SRI MAHESH KUMAR BORO SON OF LATE PRANESWAR BORO R/O VILL- HANGMA CHAPORI SIMEN CHAPORI, DIST. DHEMAJI, ASSAM, PIN-7887061. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE (SLC) FOR APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN- CUM-CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 4:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-781019. 5:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER (DEEO) DHEMAJI Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN-787057. 6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DHEMAJI-CUM- CHAIRMAN DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE (DLC) FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT DHEMAJI ASSAM. PIN-787057 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D BHUYAN, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, ELEM. EDU BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER 21/04/2026 Heard Mr. D Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P Saikia, learned Government Advocate and Mr. B Talukdar, learned Standing counsel, Elementary Education Department. 2. The petitioner by way of instituting the present writ petition, has prayed for a direction upon the respondent authorities for consideration of his case for appointment on compassionate grounds. 3. The father of the petitioner had died-in-harness on 17.07.2016. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court by way of instituting a writ petition, being WP(C) No. 4879/2023. The said writ petition was on consideration dismissed by this Court vide order dated 25.01.2024. The said order in absence of a challenge, has attained its finality. Page No.# 3/3 4. It is in the above background that the present writ petition has been again instituted praying for the same reliefs, as prayed for, in WP(C) No. 4879/2023. 5. The said aspect of the matter being pointed out to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present writ petition has been inadvertently filed and accordingly, prays that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition. 6. The prayer is not objected to by the learned counsels for the respondents. 7. Accordingly, in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. 8. It is made clear that no liberty has been granted to the petitioner to institute any fresh proceedings praying for consideration of his case for appointment on compassionate grounds. JUDGE Comparing Assistant