Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3048 (CAL)

HIRAK PAUL v. DIPANWITA DATTA

FA/67/2025 · 2026-07-01

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, Supratim Bhattacharya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Form No.J(2) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya & The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Supratim Bhattacharya FA No. 67 of 2025 + CAN 3 of 2025 Hirak Paul -vs- Dipanwita Datta For the appellant : Mr. Prantick Ghosh, Mr. Prasad Bhattacharyya, Advs. For the respondent : Satyam Mukherjee, Adv. Heard on : July 1, 2026. Judgment on : July 1, 2026. Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.: 1. From the final report of the Mediator, we find that the matter has been settled between the parties by way of mediation. 2. A notarized joint terms of settlement dated June 19, 2026 has also been made a part of the mediators’ report. 2 3. Accordingly, FA No. 67 of 2025 is disposed of in terms of the terms of settlement annexed to the report of the Mediator, which be deemed to be a part of the decree. 4. CAN 3 of 2025 is consequentially disposed of as well. 5. There will be no order as to costs. 6. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. 7. A formal decree be drawn up accordingly. I agree. (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.) (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.) D/L. 3. 01.07.2026. MNS